<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In place replacement / upgrade &#8211; Redhat and Centos</title>
	<atom:link href="/2012/11/in-place-replacement-upgrade-redhat-and-centos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/2012/11/in-place-replacement-upgrade-redhat-and-centos/</link>
	<description>Almost crazy about Opensource / Free  information.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:37:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/2012/11/in-place-replacement-upgrade-redhat-and-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-2309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/?p=887#comment-2309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Policy and vendor support are at the hart of the issue. Start-ups often are more interested in cost and will it work.  As the company grows it starts to set policies and investors want to know you are paying for your licenses.  Inc. 5000 companies believe paying for vendor support is important. 

My experience of thirty years tells me very few system are pure. Because developers like to push hard into newer code bases even production server often contain base language libraries (perl, python, java) that are from no-vendor sources. 

Then there is the question of the support it self. I worked on the Dell Linux/Complex systems support team.  I experienced some crazy support problems.   Thinks like a Dell server with an multi terabyte Apple drive array running CenOS linux. (This was a four letter government agency.) Yes Dell did support it. 

If you pay your support money, vendors will bend over backwards to help you fix you issues. Including, contacting another vendor on your behalf to resolve the problem.  So, support is worth the money you pay.  But it&#039;s not cheep!

Also, I&#039;d rather a company use CentOS rather then pirate Redhat or play the entitlement shell game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Policy and vendor support are at the hart of the issue. Start-ups often are more interested in cost and will it work.  As the company grows it starts to set policies and investors want to know you are paying for your licenses.  Inc. 5000 companies believe paying for vendor support is important. </p>
<p>My experience of thirty years tells me very few system are pure. Because developers like to push hard into newer code bases even production server often contain base language libraries (perl, python, java) that are from no-vendor sources. </p>
<p>Then there is the question of the support it self. I worked on the Dell Linux/Complex systems support team.  I experienced some crazy support problems.   Thinks like a Dell server with an multi terabyte Apple drive array running CenOS linux. (This was a four letter government agency.) Yes Dell did support it. </p>
<p>If you pay your support money, vendors will bend over backwards to help you fix you issues. Including, contacting another vendor on your behalf to resolve the problem.  So, support is worth the money you pay.  But it&#8217;s not cheep!</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;d rather a company use CentOS rather then pirate Redhat or play the entitlement shell game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shlomi Noach</title>
		<link>http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/2012/11/in-place-replacement-upgrade-redhat-and-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-2280</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shlomi Noach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mysqlfanboy.com/?p=887#comment-2280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the major difference is the type of packages a user will agree to install, given that they may/may not be supported by RedHat.

A CentOS user will install rpmforge, and then the sky&#039;s the limit. RH will not support these; so migrating to RHEL also means the user should be very careful with package selection.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the major difference is the type of packages a user will agree to install, given that they may/may not be supported by RedHat.</p>
<p>A CentOS user will install rpmforge, and then the sky&#8217;s the limit. RH will not support these; so migrating to RHEL also means the user should be very careful with package selection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
